Apprenticeship success should be judged by quality
SummitSkills has welcomed the conclusions of a BIS report that suggests quality, and not just quantity, should be the UK’s focus for apprenticeships.
Produced by the House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, the Apprenticeships – Fifth Report is the result of an inquiry that was announced in December 2011. Among the issues it set out to investigate were the impact of the National Apprenticeship Service, current funding arrangements, whether there is a need for extra funding, the quality of apprenticeships, and apprenticeship bonuses.
Keith Marshall OBE, Chief Executive of SummitSkills, said: “We welcome the BIS Select Committee’s report on apprenticeships which addresses many issues close to our heart as a sector skills council. We agree with much of what it says, in particular the need to concentrate equally on the quality and not just the quantity of apprenticeships.
“Together with the Holt Review published in the summer and the Richard Review, the Select Committee’s report will help to create a picture of the general state of apprenticeships and where the UK must direct its attention to secure a successful workforce for the future.”
Lack of focus
Last year, the Government invested £1.2 billion in the apprenticeship programme. The Select Committee report welcomes an increase in apprenticeships (457,200 people started new training as an apprentice last year) but is concerned that rapid expansion of the Government’s apprenticeship programme could result in a lack of focus.
In particular, the report suggest that the UK should not be satisfied with only providing entry level apprenticeships and that Government, employers and schools need to be far more ambitious in expanding and delivering higher and advanced apprenticeships.
In their report, the Select Committee says: “While we welcome the expansion in apprenticeship starts, the success of the apprenticeship programme should not be judged by numbers alone. At present, the National Apprenticeship Service’s objectives are too heavily weighted on numbers. In the future, the quality of the programme should be seen as an equal priority, and should be assessed rigorously.”